Egor Gerasimov vs Luca Margaroli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L W W W L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Gerasimov 1 - 0 Margaroli
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gerasimov winning 2 and Margaroli winning 1. The last match between Gerasimov and Margaroli was at the Lugano Challenger, 03-03-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Egor Gerasimov getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Egor Gerasimov | 1 |
| Luca Margaroli | 0 |
Lugano Challenger(03-03-2024)
4
6
6
1
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tomova VS Eala PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Luca Margaroli
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:27:15 | Average Match Time | 1:27:15 |
| 75% (61/81) | 1st Serve % | 65% (45/69) |
| 75% (46/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (30/45) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 42% (29/69) | Return Points Win % | 32% (26/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Egor Gerasimov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Egor Gerasimov
34%
(
13 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Axel Garcian
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Egor Gerasimov
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
95 of
129)
12
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
61 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
66 of
95)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
22 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
41 of
129)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Naoya Honda
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Axel Garcian
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Egor Gerasimov
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Egor Gerasimov
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Egor Gerasimov
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Margaroli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Luca Margaroli
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Luca Margaroli
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Luca Margaroli
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Luca Margaroli
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rafael Matos
Player
Luca Margaroli
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Luca Margaroli
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
5
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Luca Margaroli
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (431/331) | Win/Loss | 38% (146/242) |
| 55% (1003/820) | Sets Win/Loss | 40% (348/522) |
| 52% (9160/8509) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (3696/4353) |
| 59% (190/132) | Hard Win/Loss | 42% (76/103) |
| 46% (59/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (53/96) |
| 60% (179/118) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28% (17/43) |
| 21% (3/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 4084 | Aces Total | 774 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1799 | Total Double Faults | 476 |
| 1:14:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 515.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.66 |
| 64% (27985/43883) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6724/10715) |
| 73% (20306/27985) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4509/6724) |
| 49% (7776/15890) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1882/3992) |
| 40% (1496/3706) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (331/786) |
| 37% (16217/43490) | Return Points Win % | 35% (3665/10346) |
| 31% (12/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (4/15) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72% (18/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (88/73) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (198/141) | Challenger W/L | 36% (44/78) |
| 62% (110/67) | Futures W/L | 39% (101/158) |
| 57% (411/727) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (141/380) |
| 57% (16/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (160/308) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (53/117) |
| 53% (142/266) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (38/98) |
| 86% (410/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (152/122) |
| 14% (410/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (152/30) |
| 23% (351/81) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (236/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
